PRACTICE · IV · DEEP AGENT WORKFLOWS

End-to-end ownership, not single-step copilots.

Most “AI” engagements ship a copilot, a chat box bolted to a workflow that already existed. We ship workflow ownership: agents that close incidents, close month-end, and own the seam between ServiceNow and Salesforce. The deliverable is an SLA, not a feature.

The difference between a copilot and a deep workflow agent is what happens when you walk away. A copilot requires a human in the loop on every step; remove the human and nothing happens. A deep workflow agent owns the outcome: it triages, routes, executes, reconciles, and only escalates when the policy says it should. The human reviews the exception, not the ninety-eight cases that ran clean.

And in production, an agent rarely works alone. The multi-agent workflows we ship cross the functional seams where single-agent pilots die: triage, route, execute, escalate only when policy says so. Building this is more engineering than prompting. Orchestration on open protocols, cross-system access scoped through IAM-for-agents, multi-model selection per step, evaluations in CI, and an observability stack that traces each agent the way SRE traces each service. No agent washing: if a step doesn’t need an agent, we don’t build one.

From Production · Recent Deployments

I30–50%IT ops auto-close rate
II5 daysMonth-end shaved
III<200msAgent-to-agent latency
IV1.0Workflow owner, not feature

I. MTTR cut on incident ticketing for the typical mid-market deployment.

II. Finance close compressed from twelve to seven days with agentic reconciliation.

III. MCP / A2A orchestration on AgentCore, Foundry, and Vertex.

IV. Each deep-workflow agent owns the outcome, not a single step inside it.

Capabilities · Under the Hood

  1. Orchestration on open protocols

    MCP for tool access, A2A for agent-to-agent. Vendor-agnostic so your orchestration layer outlives any single vendor.

  2. Cross-system workflows

    ServiceNow + Salesforce + your data warehouse, treated as one continuous surface. Not three integrations to maintain.

  3. Multi-model by default

    Claude, GPT, Gemini, Grok. Each picked for the step it's good at, evaluated with LLM-as-judge in CI.

  4. Observability & FinOps

    Per-agent tracing, per-step cost attribution, agent registry, IAM for agents. Production support that looks like SRE, not magic.

On the line

The copilot suggests. The agent ships.

START · THE WORKFLOW BRIEF

Which workflow goes first?

Take the Agentic Readiness Assessment to baseline deep agent workflows alongside the other five dimensions. Or come straight to the working session.